On "Golden Parachutes" as Manager Discipline Devices in Takeover Contests

Abstract

The effect of severance pay on management behavior during a takeover battle is generally ambiguous. Yet, the severance payment completely restraining all influence activities always constitutes a golden parachute. The manager leaving office still benefits from the increase in the merged firm s total value. Moreover, given that managers are compensated according to an identical scheme, the optimal shareholder policy always entails a corner solution. Managers will either receive no severance pay, or the payment will be chosen such that their influence activities equal zero. Relatively strong incentive intensities and low synergy gains then imply that offering no severance pay dominates.